Reputación Digital

New SMR Wave: the Sample Reaches 6,649 Media Outlets with the Inclusion of Radio

The final 2025 edition of the SCImago Media Ranking (SMR), the winter wave, completes for the first time the representation of the global media ecosystem and strengthens the accuracy of the Digital Reputation Index (DRI)

The SCImago Media Ranking closes 2025 with the most comprehensive sample since its inception, driven by the incorporation of radio as a new media type. This edition marks the end of a phase of sustained expansion that has led the ranking to grow by 36% from its first edition in 2022 to more than 6,500 media outlets in the most recent wave.

Since its launch, the SMR has evolved from a classification focused on legacy and native press into the first global map of the contemporary communication ecosystem. Successive editions have progressively expanded the scope of the project to integrate general-interest press, business and sports media, television, and now radio, thereby reinforcing the original objective of comprehensively mapping the presence and visibility of media in the digital environment.

The historical trajectory illustrates this progress clearly: in 2022, the sample included more than 4,500 newspapers in 90 languages; in 2023, analyses were introduced on the prevalence of the printed press, the linguistic hegemony of English, and regional media behavior; and in 2024, two decisive categories—sports and business—were added, along with new filters that allow navigation by typologies, levels of coverage, and platforms.

The 2025 edition culminates this process by integrating all radio broadcasters identified at a global scale and by adding a new content category—music—thus reinforcing the presence of radio within the ranking and completing, for the first time, the representation of both traditional and digital media. Television also gains greater prominence compared to previous editions, consolidating itself as one of the most robust blocks within the ranking.

Specifically, the SMR currently includes 6,649 media outlets and offers a set of variables that allow the media ecosystem to be analyzed from multiple perspectives, facilitating comparative studies and more precise analyses of the influence, reach, and diversity of media organizations worldwide.

The first category corresponds to the type of content produced by the media outlets included in the sample. This variable distinguishes between general, musical, financial, sports, and cultural content, making it possible to identify which informational areas concentrate greater prestige and impact in the digital environment. From a research perspective, this classification is particularly useful for analyzing thematic specialization among media and for studying which types of content generate greater visibility and reputation depending on the social and economic context.

The second category refers to the type of media, differentiating between digital-native media, magazines, news agencies, newspapers, radio stations, television channels, and other typologies. This variable allows observation of how different media formats are positioned within the ranking and enables comparisons between the performance of traditional and digital media. It also provides relevant insights into media adaptation processes to the online environment and into the evolution of news consumption according to platform.

Third and fourth, the ranking incorporates the variables of region and country, which make it possible to segment results geographically. These categories facilitate a more detailed analysis of the media landscape in specific areas, enabling comparative studies between countries or regions and the examination of inequalities, concentrations of media power, or informational particularities according to geopolitical context. For academic research, these variables are key to contextualizing data and avoiding overly homogeneous global interpretations.

Finally, the language variable adds a linguistic dimension to the analysis of the ranking. Identifying the predominant languages in the international media landscape allows reflection on the importance of language as a vehicle for communication and as a factor of reach and influence. This category is particularly relevant in countries or regions where media use non-native languages or languages with greater international projection, which can directly affect their visibility, reputation, and capacity for global dissemination.

Taken together, these variables make the SCImago ranking a particularly valuable tool for communication research, as it not only orders media by impact but also enables exploration of the cultural, linguistic, geographic, and structural dynamics that shape the current digital media ecosystem.

The SCImago Media Ranking is a joint project of the Universities of Granada, Navarra, and Pompeu Fabra, developed by SCImago Lab. Its aim is to provide a rigorous and accessible tool to understand the global information ecosystem through comparable metrics. The full methodology of the DRI can be consulted at scimagomedia.com/methodology.

SCImago Media Ranking Summer 2025 Edition: More Than 6,000 Media Organizations Under the Microscope

The Summer 2025 edition of the SCImago Media Rankings is now available, offering an updated snapshot of the global media landscape.

With more than 6,000 media outlets, including newspapers, television stations, digital natives, magazines, news agencies, and data from 190 countries and more than 30 languages, this platform reaffirms its position as one of the most comprehensive tools for analyzing media visibility and online reputation.

The SCImago Media Rankings not only establishes a global media ranking, but has also become a key tool for analyzing the digital information ecosystem. Thanks to its comparative approach, it identifies emerging trends, visibility dynamics, and changes in media positioning, providing valuable insight into the evolution of journalism in the digital age.

Its ranking is based on a series of objective indicators such as web traffic, SEO ranking, and domain authority, providing an effective and transparent methodology. The platform also allows for customized comparisons by country, media type, or level of digital impact, adapting to different analytical needs, both academic and professional.

At a time when media credibility, digital presence, and online influence are more important than ever, this new wave serves as an indispensable compass for those who want to understand how the world of information works.

SCImago Media Rankings (SMR) as a Methodological Source for Media Research

The rigour and impact of high-quality media research are intrinsically linked to methodology. In studies that adopt a case study approach, the selection of sources to define the object of study is also a crucial factor.

In this context, the SCImago Media Rankings (SMR) emerge as a promising starting point with vast research potential on a global scale. This project initially set out to construct the first global map of general news outlets (including both print newspapers with digital versions and digital-native publications). It now extends this framework to incorporate a worldwide selection of leading sports and financial media.

Researchers can also utilise country, regional, and language filters when conducting their studies. Additionally, efforts are underway to integrate a global sample of audiovisual news media, including major television networks.

As a reflection of the research opportunities presented by the SMR, it is worth highlighting the valuable work undertaken by Mari Vállez, Juan José Boté-Vericad, Javier Guallar, and Marco Bastos. Their study examines the publication strategies of five leading media organisations—those ranking highest in digital reputation according to the SMR—during the acquisition of Twitter (now X) by entrepreneur Elon Musk.

The full article is available via the following link. However, we present below a translated summary of the research:

This study analyses the publication strategies of traditional media outlets on Twitter following the platform’s acquisition by Elon Musk. We employ the SCImago Media Rankings to identify the news organisations with the largest online audiences, namely The Guardian, The New York Times, USA Today, The Independent, and The Washington Post. Data were gathered via Twitter’s Academic API v2 and the SEMrush platform in early 2023, covering the entirety of 2022. The dataset includes website audits that monitor domain traffic, with the aggregated data subsequently processed using R packages and Atlas.ti.
Our analysis reveals that a stronger presence on Twitter correlates with a significant increase in social traffic, as evidenced by The Independent. This contrasts sharply with other media outlets. These differences persist regardless of the thematic focus of coverage—predominantly centred on the Russia-Ukraine war—or the compositional characteristics of their posts, which largely omit typical Twitter elements such as hashtags and @ mentions. We conclude by discussing the communication strategies employed by news organisations on Twitter following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform in 2022.

This research was published in July 2024 in the specialist journal Journalism Studies, under the Taylor & Francis imprint, following a rigorous peer-review process.

‘Digital reputation indicator: A webometric approach for a global ranking of digital media’, trending paper in Altmetrics

What does the Digital Reputation Indicator (DRI) measure? Can we evaluate and compare the digital reputation of media outlets objectively and on a global scale? The article “Digital Reputation Indicator: A Webometric Approach for a Global Ranking of Digital Media”, recently published in Journalism by Magdalena Trillo-Domínguez, Ramón Salaverría, Lluís Codina, and Félix de Moya-Anegón, has been recognized as a “trending paper” in Altmetrics, reflecting the growing interest and attention that the research led by SCImago Research Group is generating around this new line of work, which focuses on digital media both academically and professionally.

Altmetrics assesses the influence and visibility of scientific research beyond traditional metrics like journal impact factor. Instead of relying solely on academic citations, this approach considers a range of indicators that reflect the online attention and impact of a scientific paper.

In “Digital Reputation Indicator: A Webometric Approach for a Global Ranking of Digital Media”, the authors explain the methodology behind SCImago Media Rankings (SMR), introducing the Digital Reputation Indicator (DRI). This indicator allows for the evaluation and comparison of the reputation of digital news media at a global level. Since January 2023, SCImago Media Rankings (scimagomedia.com) has been using the DRI as a composite evaluation and measurement tool, weighting web-based metrics from reliable, stable, and globally accessible sources.

https://twitter.com/rsalaverria/status/1767468722501902842?s=20

The Digital Reputation Indicator (DRI) provides a foundation for the qualitative comparison of digital media using a webometric model based on the following aspects:

  • Citation Flow: Assesses the level at which media outlets are cited by other websites.
  • Trust Flow: Analyzes the quality of the websites linking to the media.
  • Domain Authority Scores (Domain Rating and Authority Score): Evaluates the authority of media domains.

This webometric approach surpasses the limitations of the two dominant media measurement paradigms used until now:

  1. The traditional model, based on audience metrics.
  2. The more recent model, focused on social media popularity.

The DRI emerges as a valuable resource for both the academic community and digital journalism professionals.

This research is part of a new line of study driven by the SCImago Research Group, aimed at the global analysis and evaluation of digital media.